Hands on: Canon EOS R5 Mark II review – a polished upgrade

How do you improve on one of the outright best cameras, the EOS R5? By making its successor quicker in just about every regard, which is what Canon has managed to do with the new Canon EOS R5 II.

It’s a versatile professional camera that captures high-resolution 45MP stills and 8K video like the EOS R5, but with a few new features under the hood that improve overall performance, and an impressive array of video features and high-speed modes.

The sensor resolution stays at 45MP, but it’s now a stacked sensor with faster readout that should eliminate rolling shutter distortion, as on the Nikon Z8. Canon says the EOS R5 II (and new flagship EOS R1) boast the fastest sensor readout speed on the market.

We also get what Canon calls a ‘DIGIC Accelerator’ – which is effectively a new second processor to bolster the DIGIC X and deliver faster processing speeds, resulting in faster burst-shooting speeds, now up to 30fps, that can be sustained for longer, with pre-recording up to 15 frames.

Another major new feature for the line is Eye Control AF (as used in the EOS R3) and the latest version of Canon’s Dual Pixel Intelligent AF system, now equipped with what Canon calls deep learning and specific Action Priority modes including basketball, football, and volleyball. The autofocus system is able to recognize and store specific faces and body postures, and predict movement to focus sharply on what’s important in the frame.

You could be forgiven for thinking that these new features sound like they should be in a pro sports camera, like the pricier EOS R1 announced on the same day; and indeed they are, so it’s majorly impressive that Canon has also added them to a cheaper, all-purpose professional camera like the EOS R5 II.

Canon needed to add in these improvements really, because how else could it improve on the four-year-old EOS R5, a camera which has stood the test of time and remains one of the best cameras for photography?

For a certain type of photographer, though, the EOS R5 II is overkill, and the EOS R5 will do just fine: landscape and portrait photographers, stand down. But if you ever shoot action, or would like a better-equipped video camera, then the EOS R5 II steps in.

It’s a faster camera in every way, impressively tracking subjects in high-speed action scenarios. However, I didn’t have the older model to compare just how much faster and reliable the EOS R5 II is for action, impressive as the new AF modes appear to be. Image stabilization performance has, at least on paper, been improved too, while there are some intriguing new in-camera AI-powered image-editing tools, of which more later.

Outwardly the EOS R5 II has changed little compared to its predecessor, although I was pleased to see new cooling vents on the underside of the EOS R5 II to minimize overheating, which was a well-publicized criticism of the EOS R5. There are also not one, nor two, but three optional vertical grip accessories to choose from, one of which includes a cooling fan to extend video record times.

There’s lots to talk about in the new model, but I’ve only had a day with a beta version of the EOS R5 II, and I’m still working on a more in-depth full review. For now, my first impressions are highly positive, and the Canon EOS R5 II could be the new full-frame mirrorless camera to beat.

Canon EOS R5 II: release date and price

• Body-only price is $4,299 / £4,499 / AU$6,699
• Available from August 2024
• Three optional grips: Standard BG-R20, battery BG-R20EP and cooling fan CF-R20EP

The Canon EOS R5 II launches with a body-only price of $4,499 / £4,499 / AU$6,699, which is around 10% more than the launch price of the EOS R5. The price difference feels about right allowing for inflation and the new features on offer, although it would have been nice to see it priced a little closer to the EOS R5’s launch price to better compete with the Nikon Z8. You can also pick up the EOS R5 II with the 24-105mm F4L lens for $5,699 / £5,799.99 / AU$8,549.

The EOS R5 II is set to be available from August 2024, and there will be no fewer than three optional grips to choose from (prices TBC), which is a first. The Cooling Fan grip improves video record times, but lacks the vertical grip control layout which you can find in the Battery Grip that can extend battery life. 

Canon EOS R5 II: design and handling

• New blackout-free 5.76m-dot OLED EVF with Eye Control AF
• Cooling vents on the underside to minimize overheating
• Dual card slots: CFexpress Type B and SD

Canon hasn’t tinkered too much with the EOS R5 II design compared to its predecessor, and that’s a wise move. It weighs just 26.3oz / 746g, and is a smaller camera than the Nikon Z8 – it’s more in line with a Sony A7R V – though you can beef it up with an optional grip to improve the balance with larger lenses. Nonetheless, the EOS R5 II is comfortable in the hand over long sessions shooting with pro lenses, like the 24-70mm F2.8L that I used for most of this hands-on review.

Familiar it may be, the EOS R5 II actually has a few refinements over the EOS R5. The 5.76m-dot viewfinder is new: Canon says it’s twice as bright, and it’s blackout-free and equipped with Eye Control autofocus that’s twice as responsive as on the EOS R3.

If you haven’t tried Eye Control AF before, let me tell you: it’s brilliant. It tracks your eye as you scan the scene through the viewfinder, and moves the focus point accordingly, pinpointed to where you’re looking in the frame.

I initiated the autofocus function with two presets: one for horizontal shooting and the other for vertical, and the EOS R5 II had no problem recognizing my eye. In use, it performed really well, especially in tandem with subject-tracking autofocus.

Build quality is excellent, with a magnesium alloy chassis, weather-sealed exterior, and robust controls. However, I was also testing the new EOS R1 at the same time as the EOS R5 II, and to me the pro sports model had a better feel overall. For example, the control wheel on the EOS R1’s rear is nicely dampened and rotates smoothly, making the wheel on the EOS R5 II feel cheaper by comparison.

Filmmakers will appreciate the fact that the EOS R5 II has a full-size HMDI port (the EOS R5 doesn’t) and a tally lamp to indicate when you’re recording, and key info, such as waveform monitor, can be displayed on-screen.

There are also cooling vents on the camera’s underside. We don’t have official information as to how much these vents alone improve the EOS R5II’s ability to stay cool under heavy use. However, they do work with the optional Cooling Fan grip, and with this installed Canon says you’ll get over 120 minutes of continuous video record time without overheating; and Canon will certainly want to avoid any of the overheating dramas that dogged the EOS R5.

Otherwise the EOS R5 II is standard fare for a camera at this price range. You get a typical array of controls that are well laid out, a back-illuminated top-LCD, an AF joystick on the rear, control dials for quick exposure changes, and twin card slots; there’s one CFexpress Type B and one SD, and you’ll need the former, which is the faster (and pricier) card type, to make the most of the EOS R5 II’s high-speed features.

Naturally, there are both mic and headphone ports, plus USB-C for charging. The battery is the existing LP-E6P unit, which delivers up to 640 shots on a full charge, although that number will be a lot higher if you’re capturing lots of high-speed bursts.

Canon EOS R5 II: features and performance

• Improved in-body image stabilization up to 8.5EV
• Refined ‘intelligent’ dual-pixel AF 
• Up to 30fps with pre-recording
• Proxy recording can speed up video workflow

I had the opportunity to put the EOS R5 II through its paces in various high-speed scenarios, including basketball and breakdancing, rattling off thousands of frames over a relatively short period.

If you’re going to be using the EOS R5 II for action you’ll want to utilize the faster CFexpress Type B memory card. I was getting fairly short 30fps sequences when using an SD card, and the camera was getting a little warm to touch under heavy use (though that didn’t affect performance). CFexpress Type B, on the other hand, lets you shoot for much longer – I’ll confirm the numbers in my full review.

Pre-recording is new for the R5 line, and by half-pressing the shutter you can have up to 15 frames prepped before you fully press the shutter – that’s up to half a second of additional time to react to the action and start shooting.

Following the hands-on sessions, I put Canon’s Product Marketing Manager, John Maurice, on the spot by asking him what Canon thinks is the single most notable improvement in the EOS R5 II over the EOS R5, and he said it was autofocus performance.

Put simply, Canon says the EOS R5 II’s autofocus is more intelligent than the EOS R5. The ‘intelligent’ part of Canon’s refined Dual Pixel Intelligent AF system refers to deep-learning technology, colloquially called ‘AI autofocus’. There’s plenty to get to grips with here: for one thing, the EOS R5 II can register people, and once that person’s face is recognized they take priority, plus you have the option to quickly select from multiple registered faces for autofocus tracking using the AF joystick.

The EOS R5 II can store up to 10 faces, ideal for prioritizing the players of one football team, while if you’re a wedding photographer, being able to prioritize the bride and groom among many people would be super-handy.

There are also three Action Priority sports modes covering football, basketball and volleyball. Canon says the EOS R5 II recognizes which player has the ball and can prioritize that person, plus it knows various key sporting moves to prioritize, such as a volleyball player spiking.

Intelligent autofocus all sounds highly impressive, but is it any good? I shot basketball as a test scenario and, once I started getting to grips with the settings, was getting virtually every photo in sharp focus where I wanted it, although I can’t be sure yet if that success is specifically down to choosing the ‘correct’ autofocus mode. Was it better with Eye Control AF? Would I get the same results using the ‘incorrect’ setting? I’ll need to do more testing with a full production model to find out for sure. But the bottom line is that my hit ratio of sharp action photos has been staggeringly high.

Canon EOS R5 II: image and video quality

• Same 45MP resolution as the EOS R5, but the sensor is quicker
• New AI-powered in-camera edits, including upscaling and noise reduction
• 8K 60p RAW video capture and slow-motion 4K

With speed being the name of the EOS R5 II upgrade game, and the new camera having the same 45MP resolution as the EOS R5, you could be forgiven for thinking that image quality would be essentially the same, despite there being four years between the two models. That might be true for single-shot photography in good light, but the quicker processor and sensor make a difference to image quality in high-speed scenarios. For example, Canon says the stacked sensor minimizes the rolling shutter distortion that can distort movement in photos and videos by up to 40%.

I tried the new in-camera upscaling and Neural Network noise-reduction functions, too. Upscaling works on an existing image, quadrupling its resolution, and when you’re shooting 45MP stills already that means a huge 180MP image, or 16,384 x 10,928 pixels. Canon says upscaling is better than the ‘high-res shot’ modes found in other cameras, which effectively does the same thing but by another means, using pixel shift and rapidly shooting multiple images that are then combined into one larger image.

The problem with high-res shot modes is that images are taken sequentially, and so if there’s any movement between those shots you get a ghosting effect. There are no such problems with upscaling, as you’re increasing the size of a photo that you’ve already taken.

I used upscaling on a portrait, and for an image in which the subject only took up a small portion of the frame, with the idea of enlarging it to then crop in for a better composition. The AI upscaling does a decent job, but it’s not perfect: there’s a sort of processed look to upscaled photos when you’re pixel peeping. The same can be said for the new Neural Network noise reduction, which can be applied to JPEG images in-camera. However, these images were shot and processed on a pre-production Canon beta sample model, so final image quality may vary; the upscaling. feature in particular has huge potential, if it can be applied effectively.

There’s a good range of video codecs and frame rates, which makes the EOS R5 II a more versatile tool for filmmakers than the EOS R5. You get 8K 60fps raw video (onto CFexpress Type B card, not SD), 4K up to 120fps in 10-bit, and even 240fps in 2K.

What’s missing here is ‘open gate’ recording, which for now remains a trump card for Panasonic and Blackmagic video cameras. With a generous 8K video resolution to play with, it seems like a missed opportunity on Canon’s part to one-up Sony and Nikon by offering open gate, which means recording from the full height and width of the sensor. We’re instead limited to shooting 16:9, and cropping into that frame for other aspect ratios used for social.

I’ll be sure to run more extensive image and video quality tests in my full review.

How I tested the Canon EOS R5 II

• I had a single day with the Canon EOS R5 II and Canon EOS R1 at the pre-launch event for press in Munich
• I shot with a pre-production beta sample
• I paired the R5 II with the RF 24-70mm F2.8L and RF 85mm F1.2L lenses
• I shot outdoor portraits, indoor sports, and other stills photo and video using the various shooting modes

My time with the Canon EOS R5 II was brief, at just one day, during which I also tested the Canon EOS R1. I was shooting with a pre-production beta sample, so final image quality and performance from a full production model may vary. I was able to shoot in a range of scenarios, and with different lenses, with both cameras.

There were two action scenarios: basketball and breakdancing, both indoors. Another indoor setup involved photographing a cocktail maker preparing drinks, and there an outdoor session shooting models and classic German automobiles. I was armed with the RF 24-70mm F2.8L and RF 85mm F1.2L lenses.

I had some time after the shoot day to further familiarize myself with the camera and run some speed tests. Tests involved using the various burst modes and video capture modes to see how the EOS R5 II fared in heavy use, and trying out the new in-camera AI-editing tools.

First reviewed July 2024